Bitdefender and avast are a pair of the most popular anti-virus programs in the world, guarding a huge number of devices by viruses and malware. Even though both have their advantages and drawbacks, deciding on between them could be a difficult task for the purpose of users.

If you would like to know whether Bitdefender or avast is the better choice suitable for you, you need to consider how they assess in several crucial categories, which includes protection, performance, other stuff and price tag. Below, we’ll go through each of these and give you a comparison with the pros and cons of every one.

Expense and Performance

A paid release of a reliability program can be an financial commitment, so you want to ensure it works very well for you. Fortunately, both Avast and Bitdefender give you a 30-day refund to help you decide if it’s worth the buy.

Scans and User Interface

The two Avast and Bitdefender give a wide range of works, from basic protection checks to custom ones. They also add a boot-time scanner and sandboxing, which can be specifically valuable if you’re searching for or beginning files that may contain unsafe viruses.

Disk Utilization and Scan Period

As part of their very own testing, AV-Test examined each program’s impact on hard disk drive utilization. They measured the amount of storage space every used on first-run file duplicating, application unveiling and for downloading, as well as each time a full check was working.

Avast and Bitdefender both equally showed very similar results, although Avast drew much more from the hard drive. This is especially visible when running a full system scan. On my test system, Avast needed almost two hours to operate a check, while Bitdefender required only about one half that time.